Gardener Vs Rocha..

theospurs · « **on:** March 22, 2007, 02:26:39 PM »

I prefer Rocha but its close.

Biggs · « **Reply #1 on:** March 22, 2007, 02:32:58 PM »

i honestly dont know lol

kidoriginal · « **Reply #2 on:** March 22, 2007, 03:09:20 PM »

From what ive seen i prefer Gardener, looks a lot stronger and good in the air, but i havent seen Rocha that often

Daniisco · « **Reply #3 on:** March 22, 2007, 04:42:07 PM »

Rocha looks a good buy, and can only get better while he adapts to our style of play. Gardener is just average.

Dimitar B. · « **Reply #4 on:** March 22, 2007, 07:15:52 PM »

Rocha imo.

Gardener is decent backup.

Rocha goes for and wins every header, even if it means hurting himself in the process, he is very determined. He can pass well, read the game well, and looks a good player.

Gardener is injury AND mistake prone, not consistent.

Rocha for me.

SpursLad · « **Reply #5 on:** March 22, 2007, 07:47:53 PM »

Yeah Gardner has improved this season but he is always capable of a mistake.

Rocha needs time to settle but he looks solid and much better on the ball.

Rocha for me.

spurs_craig · « **Reply #6 on:** March 22, 2007, 08:22:07 PM »

IS THIS A JOKE...GARDNER IS PISS POOR...THE GUY IS CHAMPIONSHIP CLASS AT THE BEST..

that said he has looked a lot better this season...

still cant wait to see the back of him...

i would rather kept davenport and sold gardner to the spam...

Biggs · « **Reply #7 on:** March 22, 2007, 08:28:36 PM »

Rocha i reckon, as i think he will improve

thebrad · « **Reply #8 on:** March 25, 2007, 05:49:49 PM »

gardner seems to have no control over his legs

rocha 4tw

COYS · « **Reply #9 on:** March 25, 2007, 06:17:21 PM »

Quote from: spurs_craig;689

i would rather kept davenport and sold gardner to the spam...

:yeahthat:

Definatley i didn't think Davenport was bad at all, much better than gardener imo but still i think rocha is a good buy and when he settles down in the premiership could come in handy.

When king comes back though he has no chance :spoton:

Daniisco · « **Reply #10 on:** March 25, 2007, 06:40:28 PM »

I think they're both as useless as eachother.

Rocha's a top covering defender and will serve us well.

THFC · « **Reply #11 on:** March 25, 2007, 06:49:24 PM »

i agree gardener just doesnt do anything for me when he has the ball i just have this feeling in the back of my head that he is going to lose the ball but i dont really get that with rocha and i certainly dont get it with dawson:pimp:

theospurs · « **Reply #12 on:** March 25, 2007, 10:13:05 PM »

i feel abit sorry for them . it cant be easy to fill in for ledley king.

dannyn99 · « **Reply #13 on:** April 01, 2007, 11:29:45 AM »

It's got to be Rocha, he's well hard and isn't lanky

dazzaTh · « **Reply #14 on:** April 04, 2007, 10:28:22 PM »

I just couldnt resist replying on this thread as i believe gardner is a terrible player. Everytime he plays i have a heart attack when he gets the ball, he is so clumsey (almost as clumsey as bramble).

his positioning is awful. I dont no if any1 else noticed this but when chelsea equalised 3-3 in the Fa cup at the bridge, a long ball was played upto drogba and anthony gardner made absolutley no attempt to get his head on the end of it, i mean hes 6 foot 6 for christ sake, he didnt even put any pressure on drogba n then drogba calmly knocked it onto kalou who scored.

Every time a player runs at him in the penalty area i just expect him to bring him down. Best news i heard for a while was when it was announced he was injured for a while.