to my knowledge nobody has patented the word "Tottingham" so we could carry on calling ourselves that or anything we like...
as for knocking it all down, its really more a renovation in order to get rid of the running-track which English clubs tend to have a major phobia about.... obviously never been to the Stadio Olympico in Rome (when Serie A games had decent attendances, before they went the pay-per-view Live-matches route for every single game played)...
I actually think improving Cystal Palace and retaining an athletics capacity for EVERY WEEK/MONTH OF THE YEAR.... as opposed to the Spam Porn Barons idea of an athletics venue ONLY in the football close-season, is a damn mighty fine specimen of pulchritude indeedy...
both plans have plusses and minuses.... but on balance I really think Spurs' plan is better.... and the stadium will continue to be boost London image as a place where top European football will continue to be hosted for years to come.... and not used as an N-Power Championsip venue, that will attract crowds of less than half the stadium's capacity...