Auburnspur you didn't answer the first question, let me remind you that your under oath Auburnspur.
Auburnspur I don't think you wan't to admit coming up with your id name, as it is laughable, what are you a rednuts, but afraid to call it what it is, auburn seriously, or is this a girls id name, in that case sorry mam no offence.
You sound like a poly, I know absolutely nothing about it and didn't even read the article. What are you running for office?, that lame defence won't get you anywhere, I believe full well that you read what you wrote, as firstly you admitted to cut and pasting it, what did you do it with your eyes closed, secondly you were looking for that sort of controversy, and you knew something of this nature would come up, why else would you google 'controversy' with his name, thats all I did, you did wrong, just admit it, you can't play dumb here. Are we to believe you googled his name along with "controversy" and pasted the article with no knowledge that something 'controversial' about Woodgate would come up, you know exactly what you were looking for, If you describe something or someone as controversial , you mean that they are the subject of intense public argument, disagreement, or disapproval. In this case it was dissapproval for Woodgate's actions.
/size][size=0pt][/color]Also the most damming piece of evidence is when you cut and paste from an external source the editing font sizes, type etc come up, which don't appear in your pasted article, so you have removed them manually by going through it and deleting them, which, you would be directly going through the article, reading it.[/size][size=0pt][/color][/size]
I have cut and pasted these from an external source, so you can see the editing. [/font].
I rest my case....