To resurrect a previous topic, I thought the below article made quite a lot of sense as to where we are now.
The backlash against Tottenham Hotspur’s Champions League exit has been forceful. Past results have been re-read, with the defeat to Monaco in mind. The collapse against Chelsea last season, meaning that Spurs handed Leicester the title, has been reevaluated to include a broader narrative, as has the embarrassing defeat to already-relegated Newcastle, which prevented Tottenham from finishing ahead of Ars*nal. The idea is that Tottenham have a habit of crumbling when the stakes are raised, that there is a pressure valve in this young squad that leads to loss of discipline and indecision.
Mauricio Pochettino has also faced criticism. The Tottenham manager has been barraged for the decision to change formation again, the third time in three games. He also left Kyle Walker and Jan Vertonghen on the bench, both of whom have indicated that they would have been fit and ready to play. Pochettino’s decisions looked baffling, almost as if the Champions League was not a priority, but the upcoming match with Chelsea was on his mind. A season of work to ensure qualification was allowed to slip away through poor performances. Some have suggested that Spurs played as if they did not want to be in the competition.
Yet the points of contention, both with Tottenham and Pochettino, arise from a number of misconceptions that serve to cast the club and the manager in a particularly harsh light. The main problem with drawing too much from Tottenham’s Champions League struggles is in the traditional English condition of underestimating the quality of European sides. The Premier League is a behemoth, both in terms of its apparent quality and its worldwide reach, yet English clubs, at least recently, have consistently struggled in Europe. Finishing 3rd, 2nd, or even 1st in the Premier League is no guarantee of European success. Monaco and Bayer Leverkusen, the two sides that will finish ahead of Spurs in the group, have European pedigree and have become accustomed to taking part in the competition. They are established, even if only in the group stage, while Tottenham are not.
Unlike those around them, this Tottenham squad is not accustomed to Champions League football. It is easy to forget, with Pep Guardiola in charge and a number of league titles to their name, that Manchester City struggled for many years with the adaptation to the Champions League. At that time, the coefficient structure was set against City, but their difficulties are instructive for Tottenham’s young squad. That City side had experienced Champions League players in the squad, while Tottenham’s largely youthful side have no real experience of playing at that level. It should, perhaps, be no surprise that the step up takes more than just one season. The real challenge is to become a regular in the competition.
Like his squad, Pochettino is also inexperienced as a manager at Champions League level. His rather smooth career trajectory has met its first real slump but, like players, managers improve with experience and with age. Pochettino will know more now about the task of reaching the summit of European football than he did before. It remains a question of using such lessons to improve the side but the guarded comments he has made so far seem to indicate that he knows the squad needs to adding to.
The match against Chelsea provides an opportunity to demonstrate that Tottenham have the quality to become regular Champions League qualifiers. Only then can the inexperience of both the squad and the manager be remedied. Without further qualification, a short trifle with Europe’s most prestigious tournament becomes meaningless.