SpursNetwork

Tottenham Discussion => Match Day Chat => Topic started by: Biggs on November 10, 2012, 11:37:28 AM

Title: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Biggs on November 10, 2012, 11:37:28 AM
(http://e0.365dm.com/football/badges/64/345.png)

Man City
____

v
____

Tottenham
(http://www.spursnetwork.com/images/matches/badges/tottenham.png)

Barclays Premier League - 11th Nov - KO 13:30  - Ground: Eithad Stadium

TV: (http://www.spursnetwork.com/images/matches/tv/ss1.gif) | Live Feed (http://spursnetwork.com/forums/index.php?board=14.0) | Make Prediction (http://spursnetwork.com/forums/index.php?board=40.0)
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: spursjoolz on November 10, 2012, 01:16:34 PM
I cannot see us win this one up there, but If we have a good defensive midfield and a wide awake defense with a on-form Lennon, Bale & Defoe,  and if they have a bad day, I predict a 1-1 draw! but am I asking too much?

I would like to see Lloris start today. His performance on Thursday suggests that he is showing a lack of confidence. He needs games and this one would be a good one for him. :nods:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 11, 2012, 12:49:22 PM
Surely if Lloris is showing a lack of confidence this is not the game to start him in is it? I would think that we need a Keeper who is FULL of CONFIDENCE and playing well would we not? or am I missing something??


 :o :o :o
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 11, 2012, 01:26:44 PM
I have just seen the SPURS team for today Defoe out, Adebayour in, and he is persisting with Dempsey, I cannot believe that he isn't starting Defoe and Adebayour together, what is wrong with him.


 :o :o :o >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: ugs on November 11, 2012, 02:27:44 PM
I have just seen the SPURS team for today Defoe out, Adebayour in, and he is persisting with Dempsey, I cannot believe that he isn't starting Defoe and Adebayour together, what is wrong with him.


 :o :o :o >:( >:( >:(

I agree totally its half time and Dempsey has touched the ball about twice.... we are very fortunate that Citeh are in such disarray, they can't get it together at the moment. God help us if they get it together in the second half because they have got in behind us about 6 times so far !!
 
 :-\
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: aspursfan on November 11, 2012, 03:02:40 PM
Here we go again. Lost a 0-1 lead again. Hopefully we aren't going to spend the last 20 minutes pinned back in our half.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: ugs on November 11, 2012, 04:21:42 PM
To sum up this game
 
Poor Tactics + Poor Motivation + Poor Direction + Poor Substitutions = No Points again !!!
 
They were there for the taking today and AVB couldn't get his tactics, substitutions and worst of all motivation right, we lack confidence and direction and look terrible in defence.
The only thing that stopped us getting a hammering today is Citeh look more disorganised than us but at least their manager changed his tactics and system and got the job done !!!!
 
 :'(   >:(
 
 
 
 
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 11, 2012, 05:06:40 PM
To be fair City are unbeaten home and away this season. Considering we've still got an injury problem our defeat doesn't look too bad, considering. I expected a lot worse result. Nevertheless I will judge over a season, not at the start of the season. We are 6th in the league and above Ars*nal.  We are 10points behind the leaders and not that far behind the rest of the top 5.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: ugs on November 11, 2012, 06:40:02 PM
To be fair City are unbeaten home and away this season. Considering we've still got an injury problem our defeat doesn't look too bad, considering. I expected a lot worse result. Nevertheless I will judge over a season, not at the start of the season. We are 6th in the league and above Ars*nal.  We are 10points behind the leaders and not that far behind the rest of the top 5.

Excuses excuses excuses ... we are behind Wet Spam and we have a manger who can't manage or understand how to change tactics... playing a high line against the attack Man City have is suicidal, picking Dempsey week in week out if he touched the ball more than 10 times today I'll be amazed. Taking one of two players off who was actually causing Citeh problems, Adebayor, and leaving Dempsey on .... wait till the end of the season and we will be 30+ points behind the leaders and not that far above the bottom 5
If we play like that again next week we won't be in front of Ars*nal any more ffs can't you see that we are going backwards, getting worse and losing confidence or are you just going to keep dribbling on about get behind the manager and judge him over a season crap !!!!
 
He ain't good enough period full stop end of argument tactically inept and can't motivate !!!!
 
 :tickedoff:   :'(   >:(
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: spursjoolz on November 11, 2012, 07:01:35 PM
I said that I wouldn't feed the trolls on this Forum ie; the likes of ugs,  but your comments are so negative that I wonder why you even bother following this wonderful club.

Yes we had another bad day today like a few other clubs this week-end.  I will agree with Voice that beating MC on their own turf is never easy as they have a few more millions quid and a far greater squad than us, but I am f*cked if I am going to crticise AVB or the players this early in the season.  :tickedoff:

Sure,  there are gaps to fill and areas to improve on, but this applies to every other club in the PL. I watched the Ars*nal game yesterday and the Chelsea game today and they also have problems.

And please lose the Armsrtong quote!  :-[
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Yiddite on November 11, 2012, 08:22:39 PM
Didn't expect to see Adebayor partnered with Defoe but think Adebayor
was  a good choice. He upset Mancity for sure and to sub him as he was getting
tired and "involved" was to me a good decision considering he already had a yellow card.
Otherwise we could have been down to 10 men .......

Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 11, 2012, 08:27:33 PM
To be fair City are unbeaten home and away this season. Considering we've still got an injury problem our defeat doesn't look too bad, considering. I expected a lot worse result. Nevertheless I will judge over a season, not at the start of the season. We are 6th in the league and above Ars*nal.  We are 10points behind the leaders and not that far behind the rest of the top 5.

Excuses excuses excuses ... we are behind Wet Spam and we have a manger who can't manage or understand how to change tactics... playing a high line against the attack Man City have is suicidal, picking Dempsey week in week out if he touched the ball more than 10 times today I'll be amazed. Taking one of two players off who was actually causing Citeh problems, Adebayor, and leaving Dempsey on .... wait till the end of the season and we will be 30+ points behind the leaders and not that far above the bottom 5
If we play like that again next week we won't be in front of Ars*nal any more ffs can't you see that we are going backwards, getting worse and losing confidence or are you just going to keep dribbling on about get behind the manager and judge him over a season crap !!!!
 
He ain't good enough period full stop end of argument tactically inept and can't motivate !!!!
 
 :tickedoff:   :'(   >:(
Some of the top managers, pundits and even players have said that he should be given a chance. You are certainly not a football expert - granted you are an expert at moaning - unless you are the Ars*nal manager? And even if you are I suggest you look closer to home.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: ugs on November 11, 2012, 08:48:58 PM
To be fair City are unbeaten home and away this season. Considering we've still got an injury problem our defeat doesn't look too bad, considering. I expected a lot worse result. Nevertheless I will judge over a season, not at the start of the season. We are 6th in the league and above Ars*nal.  We are 10points behind the leaders and not that far behind the rest of the top 5.

Excuses excuses excuses ... we are behind Wet Spam and we have a manger who can't manage or understand how to change tactics... playing a high line against the attack Man City have is suicidal, picking Dempsey week in week out if he touched the ball more than 10 times today I'll be amazed. Taking one of two players off who was actually causing Citeh problems, Adebayor, and leaving Dempsey on .... wait till the end of the season and we will be 30+ points behind the leaders and not that far above the bottom 5
If we play like that again next week we won't be in front of Ars*nal any more ffs can't you see that we are going backwards, getting worse and losing confidence or are you just going to keep dribbling on about get behind the manager and judge him over a season crap !!!!
 
He ain't good enough period full stop end of argument tactically inept and can't motivate !!!!
 
 :tickedoff:   :'(   >:(
Some of the top managers, pundits and even players have said that he should be given a chance. You are certainly not a football expert - granted you are an expert at moaning - unless you are the Ars*nal manager? And even if you are I suggest you look closer to home.

Once again you accuse me of something I'm not and your only retort is to give AVB a chance because some other people say the same.
Look at the what happened today and can you honestly say that there was anything there to give you hope, and be honest don't just blindly say I'm going to give AVB a season and I'm a gooner. Actually evaluate what happened on the pitch at the Etihad and tell me that we are improving if you can because there was very little there today to make any real Spurs fan smile and if your honest you will admit we are going backwards
 
I'm not hopeful that you will be honest because so far all you've done is bury your head in the sand like alot of other people, I'm desperate for us to do well but before that happens we will need to employ another manager.....sorry but I can't see any other way AVB just isn't good enough give him 1 season give him 10 seasons the truth is he ain't gonna make it !!!!!!!
 
 :nods:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: spursjoolz on November 11, 2012, 11:08:56 PM
Surely if Lloris is showing a lack of confidence this is not the game to start him in is it? I would think that we need a Keeper who is FULL of CONFIDENCE and playing well would we not? or am I missing something??




I mean,  the longer he plays bit parts the more difficult it will be to integrate in the side. He needs regular games to retain his form I would like to see AVB reverse th roles: Lloris in league games ans Freidel in cup games,
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RiffHard on November 12, 2012, 06:23:26 AM
Surely if Lloris is showing a lack of confidence this is not the game to start him in is it? I would think that we need a Keeper who is FULL of CONFIDENCE and playing well would we not? or am I missing something??




I mean,  the longer he plays bit parts the more difficult it will be to integrate in the side. He needs regular games to retain his form I would like to see AVB reverse th roles: Lloris in league games ans Freidel in cup games,
Sure, he needs games. But, I'm not sure he would've saved us yesterday.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 12, 2012, 07:43:14 AM
I cannot see us win this one up there, but If we have a good defensive midfield and a wide awake defense with a on-form Lennon, Bale & Defoe,  and if they have a bad day, I predict a 1-1 draw! but am I asking too much?

I would like to see Lloris start today. His performance on Thursday suggests that he is showing a lack of confidence. He needs games and this one would be a good one for him. :nods:

I'm with you on this one Joolz. Not because Friedal has done anything wrong, he hasn't. By the same token, what has Defoe done wrong ?? and he was dropped.
I thought we played well in midweek, and had a good win. Surely, injury permitting, we should have stuck with the same 11 and same system. If Lloris is not going to be our no 1 keeper, then we migh just as well sell him in January, as we are truely going backwards again.
Where were Bale and Lennon yesterday ? They never got into the game, and without them we are useless going forwards, no creativity whatsoever.
Lets face it, the way we were playing, at half time it was pretty obvious that sooner or later City would score and go on to win the game.
2 attempts on target is simply not good enough. Defoe and Ade up front is a must. So far I have supported AVB 100% but if we play like this against Ars*nal, we will get beaten, make no mistake, and AVB may not recover from that.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 12, 2012, 09:53:24 AM
Quote
  Once again you accuse me of something I'm not and your only retort is to give AVB a chance because some other people say the same.
First of all I don’t care what other people say. I make my own judgement. And that judgement is to give him a chance. You can’t judge a person on a limited amount of time. There have been some great managers – from all different teams – that their fans wanted them out (Ferguson being one) and they were given more time and they achieved their goals.
You say I accuse you of being something you are not; so you are not a “boo boy” and you support our manager and team. OK, then I apologise. Just give Spurs a chance.
Quote
Look at the what happened today and can you honestly say that there was anything there to give you hope, and be honest don't just blindly say I'm going to give AVB a season and I'm a gooner. Actually evaluate what happened on the pitch at the Etihad and tell me that we are improving if you can because there was very little there today to make any real Spurs fan smile and if your honest you will admit we are going backwards
There was plenty to give me hope. Even in the Wigan game. Of course you may dismiss me as irrelevant (ok) but listen to the commentators, pundits and analysers; they are not drawing the same conclusions as you. Has all the professionals got it wrong and few boo boys got it right? In the City game we battled well and finally conceded a late goal. We were against an unbeaten team; home and away. On top of that we didn’t have our full squad. Yes, there was plenty to give me hope.
 
Quote
I'm not hopeful that you will be honest because so far all you've done is bury your head in the sand like alot of other people, I'm desperate for us to do well but before that happens we will need to employ another manager.....sorry but I can't see any other way AVB just isn't good enough give him 1 season give him 10 seasons the truth is he ain't gonna make it !!!!!!!
You say you are not hopeful that I will be honest. Are you saying “honesty”  necessitates me to be part of the boo boys and shout and scream against our team? And that is what you call “honesty”? I am a loyal Spurs supporter that believes in getting behind my team – not wishing them to lose so I can continue booing the manager – and at least giving the manager a decent chance.
You mean you hope he doesn’t make it so at least you can come back on here and laugh at those that didn’t agree with you? Then keep your fingers crossed that Ars*nal win and Spurs lose other games and you can laugh all your way to the Championship. At least somebody will be happy!!!!!
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: ugs on November 12, 2012, 09:55:28 AM
Surely if Lloris is showing a lack of confidence this is not the game to start him in is it? I would think that we need a Keeper who is FULL of CONFIDENCE and playing well would we not? or am I missing something??




I mean,  the longer he plays bit parts the more difficult it will be to integrate in the side. He needs regular games to retain his form I would like to see AVB reverse th roles: Lloris in league games ans Freidel in cup games,

So replace one of our best players this season with a new one just cos he's younger and cost more, Friedel has been immaculate this season and if it wasn't for him we would have a lot less points.
Mind you after yesterday I wouldn't be surprised seeing as Defoe scores a hat trick and has been on fire and AVB replaces him with Adebayor and keeps playing Dempsey, yeh I can see that replace your top goalscorer and keep a useless lump in the team who touched the ball about 10 times yesterday !!!!
 
 :nope:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 12, 2012, 09:59:07 AM
Surely if Lloris is showing a lack of confidence this is not the game to start him in is it? I would think that we need a Keeper who is FULL of CONFIDENCE and playing well would we not? or am I missing something??




I mean,  the longer he plays bit parts the more difficult it will be to integrate in the side. He needs regular games to retain his form I would like to see AVB reverse th roles: Lloris in league games ans Freidel in cup games,

So replace one of our best players this season with a new one just cos he's younger and cost more, Friedel has been immaculate this season and if it wasn't for him we would have a lot less points.
Mind you after yesterday I wouldn't be surprised seeing as Defoe scores a hat trick and has been on fire and AVB replaces him with Adebayor and keeps playing Dempsey, yeh I can see that replace your top goalscorer and keep a useless lump in the team who touched the ball about 10 times yesterday !!!!
 
 :nope:

You could also argue that if it wasn't for Freidel we might not have conceded that late goal. Yes, he is a good goalkeeper but he has let some goals in he shouldn't have.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: ugs on November 12, 2012, 10:05:57 AM
Surely if Lloris is showing a lack of confidence this is not the game to start him in is it? I would think that we need a Keeper who is FULL of CONFIDENCE and playing well would we not? or am I missing something??




I mean,  the longer he plays bit parts the more difficult it will be to integrate in the side. He needs regular games to retain his form I would like to see AVB reverse th roles: Lloris in league games ans Freidel in cup games,

So replace one of our best players this season with a new one just cos he's younger and cost more, Friedel has been immaculate this season and if it wasn't for him we would have a lot less points.
Mind you after yesterday I wouldn't be surprised seeing as Defoe scores a hat trick and has been on fire and AVB replaces him with Adebayor and keeps playing Dempsey, yeh I can see that replace your top goalscorer and keep a useless lump in the team who touched the ball about 10 times yesterday !!!!
 
 :nope:

You could also argue that if it wasn't for Freidel we might not have conceded that late goal. Yes, he is a good goalkeeper but he has let some goals in he shouldn't have.

Unbelievable you think that last Man City goal was Friedel's fault, you could put any keeper in there for that goal and not one of them would of stopped it.... a full powered volley from point blank range.
 
Stop trying to justify stuff that is ridiculous Friedel didn't stand a chance the ball in by David Silva was sublimed and the finish was top class !!!!
 
 >:(
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RiffHard on November 12, 2012, 11:07:54 AM
Surely if Lloris is showing a lack of confidence this is not the game to start him in is it? I would think that we need a Keeper who is FULL of CONFIDENCE and playing well would we not? or am I missing something??




I mean,  the longer he plays bit parts the more difficult it will be to integrate in the side. He needs regular games to retain his form I would like to see AVB reverse th roles: Lloris in league games ans Freidel in cup games,

So replace one of our best players this season with a new one just cos he's younger and cost more, Friedel has been immaculate this season and if it wasn't for him we would have a lot less points.
Mind you after yesterday I wouldn't be surprised seeing as Defoe scores a hat trick and has been on fire and AVB replaces him with Adebayor and keeps playing Dempsey, yeh I can see that replace your top goalscorer and keep a useless lump in the team who touched the ball about 10 times yesterday !!!!
 
 :nope:
By the way, Defoe is injured and even withdrew from England squad.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 12, 2012, 02:43:34 PM
The facts remain that
1. We are completely unable to defend a lead or keep a clean sheet, no matter how poor the opposition.
2. We do not create or score enough goals.
3. Under pressure our crisp passing game falls apart.
We still need a CB and captain who can ORGANISE the defence. Then we need a top class attacking miffielder, and a striker.
Only then will we be able to start winning a few games that we don't do now. Never mind which manager we have, nothing will change until we address the flaws in our team.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 12, 2012, 04:55:16 PM
 
Quote
Unbelievable you think that last Man City goal was Friedel's fault, you could put any keeper in there for that goal and not one of them would of stopped it.... a full powered volley from point blank range.

Stop trying to justify stuff that is ridiculous Friedel didn't stand a chance the ball in by David Silva was sublimed and the finish was top class !!!!
 
 >:(


Can you read? I said “You could argue that if it wasn’t for Freidel we might not have conceded that late goal”. I didn’t say I “think that last Man City goal was Friedel’s fault”. There is a light difference in meaning; conjecture rather than positive.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: ugs on November 12, 2012, 06:57:34 PM
Quote
Unbelievable you think that last Man City goal was Friedel's fault, you could put any keeper in there for that goal and not one of them would of stopped it.... a full powered volley from point blank range.

Stop trying to justify stuff that is ridiculous Friedel didn't stand a chance the ball in by David Silva was sublimed and the finish was top class !!!!
 
 >:(


Can you read? I said “You could argue that if it wasn’t for Freidel we might not have conceded that late goal”. I didn’t say I “think that last Man City goal was Friedel’s fault”. There is a light difference in meaning; conjecture rather than positive.


But why even come out with the statement, absolutely pointless post !!!!
 
 8D
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 12, 2012, 08:02:24 PM
Quote
Unbelievable you think that last Man City goal was Friedel's fault, you could put any keeper in there for that goal and not one of them would of stopped it.... a full powered volley from point blank range.

Stop trying to justify stuff that is ridiculous Friedel didn't stand a chance the ball in by David Silva was sublimed and the finish was top class !!!!
 
 >:(


Can you read? I said “You could argue that if it wasn’t for Freidel we might not have conceded that late goal”. I didn’t say I “think that last Man City goal was Friedel’s fault”. There is a light difference in meaning; conjecture rather than positive.


But why even come out with the statement, absolutely pointless post !!!!
 
 8D

You seem to miss my point. I came out with my "statement," as you say, in reference to what you had previously said.

Nothing is pointless unless the mind is too dull to pick up the points that are on show. ;) :D
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: ugs on November 12, 2012, 08:31:40 PM
Quote
Unbelievable you think that last Man City goal was Friedel's fault, you could put any keeper in there for that goal and not one of them would of stopped it.... a full powered volley from point blank range.

Stop trying to justify stuff that is ridiculous Friedel didn't stand a chance the ball in by David Silva was sublimed and the finish was top class !!!!
 
 >:(


Can you read? I said “You could argue that if it wasn’t for Freidel we might not have conceded that late goal”. I didn’t say I “think that last Man City goal was Friedel’s fault”. There is a light difference in meaning; conjecture rather than positive.


But why even come out with the statement, absolutely pointless post !!!!
 
 8D

You seem to miss my point. I came out with my "statement," as you say, in reference to what you had previously said.

Nothing is pointless unless the mind is too dull to pick up the points that are on show. ;) :D


You don't half type some s**te !!!!
 
 ;) :D
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 12, 2012, 08:34:50 PM
Quote
Unbelievable you think that last Man City goal was Friedel's fault, you could put any keeper in there for that goal and not one of them would of stopped it.... a full powered volley from point blank range.

Stop trying to justify stuff that is ridiculous Friedel didn't stand a chance the ball in by David Silva was sublimed and the finish was top class !!!!
 
 >:(


Can you read? I said “You could argue that if it wasn’t for Freidel we might not have conceded that late goal”. I didn’t say I “think that last Man City goal was Friedel’s fault”. There is a light difference in meaning; conjecture rather than positive.


But why even come out with the statement, absolutely pointless post !!!!
 
 8D

You seem to miss my point. I came out with my "statement," as you say, in reference to what you had previously said.

Nothing is pointless unless the mind is too dull to pick up the points that are on show. ;) :D


You don't half type some s**te !!!!
 
 ;) :D

Well, that made me laugh. It is the old saying "If you can't think of anything intelligent to say then say something that reflects oneself. And you did ;) :D :up:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RiffHard on November 12, 2012, 08:53:30 PM
Okay, stay on topic, please.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: spursjoolz on November 12, 2012, 11:24:56 PM
Voice. I think you should stop feeding that guy, you will get nothing out of him but aggro.

I will continue to back AVB until we lose 10 games in a row (not 13!) around April next year and I beileve  Lloris should be our No.1 keeper sooner rather than later regardless of how good Friedel has been!
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 13, 2012, 07:26:16 AM
Voice. I think you should stop feeding that guy, you will get nothing out of him but aggro.

I will continue to back AVB until we lose 10 games in a row (not 13!) around April next year and I beileve  Lloris should be our No.1 keeper sooner rather than later regardless of how good Friedel has been!

Exactly Joolz. AVB and Lloris were brought in as part of a new direction for our club, one that embraces quick passing and fast tempo football. We have seen some of that this season, and Lloris is part of our future, not Friedal. He was brought in as a short term replacement to replace the hapless Gomes, and it worked. But we have to move on. Keeping Lloris on the bench is slowly destroying his confidence.
Whilst on the subject of the hapless Gomes, whom I seem to remember cost around 8 million, I would like to know who is responsible for the ongoing purchase of players who are simply not good enough, each of these costing 8 million or so it seems. The latest additions would seem to be, on the evidence so far, Dempsey and Siggurdsson, who look like joining the long list of players who will never make the grade at Spurs.
I feel that these are the reasons why we are struggling again this season, not because of AVB.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 13, 2012, 07:44:54 AM
Nothing would have saved us Sunday, the problem we have is we do not have a playmaker, why you may ask? because Mr Levy in his wisdom has sold them, Modric, VDV and Kranjar, our replacement Dembele is injured and we have no-one else cos between AVB and Levy they couldn't get one after selling VDV, I feel that they are not selecting the right players and Sunday proved it to me, playing Dempsey and not Defoe absolutely staggers me, he is just not good enough and Sunday proved that, but AVB can't see it, we were lucky to only lose 2-1. I am not saying that had Defoe played we would have won but I do think that him and Ade could have caused their defence a lot more problems, at the risk of repeating myself Dempsey does not give us anything.


 :nope: :nope: :nope:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 13, 2012, 08:02:38 AM
Quote from RSS61 'AVB and Lloris were brought in as a part of a new direction for our club, one that embraces quick passing and fast tempo football.'

You are taking the P--S aren't you, please tell me that you are, cos you can't be serious, we have been playing that type of football for the past 3 yrs, but under the present coach we are playing a brand of football that is neither quick passing nor fast tempo, I cannot remember the last time that we played a less entertaining brand of Football.


 :ohyeah: :ohyeah: :ohyeah:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RiffHard on November 13, 2012, 08:13:06 AM
playing Dempsey and not Defoe absolutely staggers me, he is just not good enough and Sunday proved that, but AVB can't see it, we were lucky to only lose 2-1. I am not saying that had Defoe played we would have won but I do think that him and Ade could have caused their defence a lot more problems, at the risk of repeating myself Dempsey does not give us anything.
Defoe was not fully fit.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 13, 2012, 08:36:56 AM
When did he get injured Riff before,during or after the game?


 ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RiffHard on November 13, 2012, 09:30:21 AM
When did he get injured Riff before,during or after the game?
I'm not his mother, I don't know. It was reported he was not fit to start and only appeared as a substitute for the last ten minutes. He was even omitted from the England squad.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 13, 2012, 11:56:21 AM
Why do you have to be such a f-----g smart arse? I asked a simple question and all it required was a simple answer, you can be such a cockhead at times Riff.


 :ohyeah: :ohyeah: :ohyeah:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 13, 2012, 12:05:56 PM
I am aware that he only played the last 10 minutes because I watched the game, I might add that it was not reported that he was not fit to start on the coverage that I watched, in fact the commentators were surprised that he wasn't included in the starting line-up after his performance on Thurs!!


 :nods: :nods: :nods:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RiffHard on November 13, 2012, 12:44:34 PM
Why do you have to be such a f-----g smart arse? I asked a simple question and all it required was a simple answer, you can be such a cockhead at times Riff.
Of course you did. Thanks for the cockhead, though. Well put, Mr Finch.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 13, 2012, 01:03:25 PM
Quote from RSS61 'AVB and Lloris were brought in as a part of a new direction for our club, one that embraces quick passing and fast tempo football.'

You are taking the P--S aren't you, please tell me that you are, cos you can't be serious, we have been playing that type of football for the past 3 yrs, but under the present coach we are playing a brand of football that is neither quick passing nor fast tempo, I cannot remember the last time that we played a less entertaining brand of Football.


 :ohyeah: :ohyeah: :ohyeah:

At times we played quick passing football under Harry, other times we lumped it up to Crouchy and Adebayor. We probably would be playing quick passing football now if we had the players capable of doing so. That is what I am getting at. Lloris is part of our future and we really don't want to loose him only for Friedal to retire in a year or two.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Yiddite on November 13, 2012, 04:35:10 PM
Defoe has got hamstring problems so presume that happened  during his short stint on Sunday as cannot
see him playing any part if the injury was known.
Also with hamstring issues are Lennon and Walker.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 13, 2012, 04:42:06 PM
Voice. I think you should stop feeding that guy, you will get nothing out of him but aggro.

I will continue to back AVB until we lose 10 games in a row (not 13!) around April next year and I beileve  Lloris should be our No.1 keeper sooner rather than later regardless of how good Friedel has been!

Luckily he is in the minority and there are more supporters like you around. :up:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 13, 2012, 04:44:56 PM
Nothing would have saved us Sunday, the problem we have is we do not have a playmaker, why you may ask? because Mr Levy in his wisdom has sold them, Modric, VDV and Kranjar, our replacement Dembele is injured and we have no-one else cos between AVB and Levy they couldn't get one after selling VDV, I feel that they are not selecting the right players and Sunday proved it to me, playing Dempsey and not Defoe absolutely staggers me, he is just not good enough and Sunday proved that, but AVB can't see it, we were lucky to only lose 2-1. I am not saying that had Defoe played we would have won but I do think that him and Ade could have caused their defence a lot more problems, at the risk of repeating myself Dempsey does not give us anything.


 :nope: :nope: :nope:

What do you mean nothing could have saved us? I don't think you were even watching the game but spend too much time listening to your Chelsea mates.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 13, 2012, 04:46:21 PM
When did he get injured Riff before,during or after the game?


 ::) ::) ::)

It is obvious you are not paying attention and have both eyes on your Chelsea mates.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 13, 2012, 04:47:01 PM
Why do you have to be such a f-----g smart arse? I asked a simple question and all it required was a simple answer, you can be such a cockhead at times Riff.


 :ohyeah: :ohyeah: :ohyeah:

And this coming from you :lol:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 14, 2012, 07:11:27 AM
Voice ,
 Either you don't read my posts, or just write your normal accusations for the sake of it. Obviously if you were watching the game it was through those rose coloured glasses that you insist on wearing, we scored against the run of play in the first half , but the goal we got was very well taken and actually exposed  Man City's defence, which is why I made my statement regarding Defoe and Ade being able to cause them problems, but obviously you chose not to read that. I have spoken to a lot of neutral supporters and to a man they all said that we were lucky to only lose 2-1, and as much as it galls me I have to agree, I think we might have had a total of 4 maybe five shots at goal, and I cannot recall Hart having to make 1 save other than the goal he let in , although I'm sure with your photographic memory you will be able to correct me!I do not think that is good enough quite frankly for a team that has its sights set on qualifying for Champions League. At the end of the game the possession percentage was 55% to 45% in favour of City probably to be expected playing away. Please do not state your normal, we have 5 injured players crap, as I keep saying we DO NOT HAVE either PLAYMAKER or the DEPTH in our SQUAD and that is a big worry, although I am sure that you will have some sort of excuse for that!!


 :nods: :nods:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 14, 2012, 07:44:48 AM
Voice ,
 Either you don't read my posts, or just write your normal accusations for the sake of it. Obviously if you were watching the game it was through those rose coloured glasses that you insist on wearing, we scored against the run of play in the first half , but the goal we got was very well taken and actually exposed  Man City's defence, which is why I made my statement regarding Defoe and Ade being able to cause them problems, but obviously you chose not to read that. I have spoken to a lot of neutral supporters and to a man they all said that we were lucky to only lose 2-1, and as much as it galls me I have to agree, I think we might have had a total of 4 maybe five shots at goal, and I cannot recall Hart having to make 1 save other than the goal he let in , although I'm sure with your photographic memory you will be able to correct me!I do not think that is good enough quite frankly for a team that has its sights set on qualifying for Champions League. At the end of the game the possession percentage was 55% to 45% in favour of City probably to be expected playing away. Please do not state your normal, we have 5 injured players crap, as I keep saying we DO NOT HAVE either PLAYMAKER or the DEPTH in our SQUAD and that is a big worry, although I am sure that you will have some sort of excuse for that!!


 :nods: :nods:

Correct. We do not have a playmaker. We also do not have organisation in our back 4, which is why we concede so many goals, often in the last few minutes of either half. And lastly, we do not have a prolific striker, in the mould of RVP who is able to bury the chances when we do create them.
Man City were there for the taking. Having scored a goal against the run of play, we should have stepped up our efforts to go on and win the game, instead we tried, unsucessfully, to hold onto our lead, something we are next to useless at.
I would rather we went out to try and win the game, and got beat 5-1 than surrender like we did.
In summary we just don't have the players right now to win games that we should be winning.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 14, 2012, 09:16:01 AM
RSS61,
 At last, someone who takes the time like myself to read posts, and then to make constructive criticism, instead of going on the attack accusing those making the criticisms of supporting other teams in order to to give themselves credence.Thank you I know that we do not necessarily agree on everything but I appreciate your support.

 ;) ;) :nods: :nods:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RiffHard on November 14, 2012, 11:34:20 AM
To be honest, our squad has been awfully thin since January when many players were allowed to go out on loan and at the same time we had many injuries (we always have). It puzzles me how our managements (Redknapp and present management) and board are yet to tackle this issue.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 14, 2012, 02:21:30 PM
To be honest, our squad has been awfully thin since January when many players were allowed to go out on loan and at the same time we had many injuries (we always have). It puzzles me how our managements (Redknapp and present management) and board are yet to tackle this issue.

This is correct. It leads me to wonder if there was friction between Redknapp and Levy over this issue this time last year. Maybe Redknapp said get me the players I need and we will mount a serious challenge for the title the second half of the season. And maybe Levy said we're in 3rd place, make do with what you have, and by the way here's Saha and Nelson for zilch.
A lot of surmising I know, but something went wrong between the two of them, and we have never been told the truth.
Fast forward, maybe AVB was promised 100 million to spend, and after he signed up, maybe Levy changed his mind ??
Either way we have ended up with the squad we have. Maybe in January Levy will prove me wrong. I doubt it though.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 14, 2012, 02:29:18 PM
RSS61,
 At last, someone who takes the time like myself to read posts, and then to make constructive criticism, instead of going on the attack accusing those making the criticisms of supporting other teams in order to to give themselves credence.Thank you I know that we do not necessarily agree on everything but I appreciate your support.

 ;) ;) :nods: :nods:

Cheers mate. Like most of us I guess, I'm just trying to be objective about what our problems are, and how best to solve them, rather than simply blaming AVB, who after all is only striving for the same things as us, with lets face it a limited bunch to work with compared to MC MU and Chelsea.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 14, 2012, 02:33:56 PM
One more thing. Bill Nicholson had 11 full internationals in the side for most of the double season. Its no wonder he did so well is it ?
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 14, 2012, 05:03:48 PM
Voice ,
 Either you don't read my posts, or just write your normal accusations for the sake of it. Obviously if you were watching the game it was through those rose coloured glasses that you insist on wearing, we scored against the run of play in the first half , but the goal we got was very well taken and actually exposed  Man City's defence, which is why I made my statement regarding Defoe and Ade being able to cause them problems, but obviously you chose not to read that. I have spoken to a lot of neutral supporters and to a man they all said that we were lucky to only lose 2-1, and as much as it galls me I have to agree, I think we might have had a total of 4 maybe five shots at goal, and I cannot recall Hart having to make 1 save other than the goal he let in , although I'm sure with your photographic memory you will be able to correct me!I do not think that is good enough quite frankly for a team that has its sights set on qualifying for Champions League. At the end of the game the possession percentage was 55% to 45% in favour of City probably to be expected playing away. Please do not state your normal, we have 5 injured players crap, as I keep saying we DO NOT HAVE either PLAYMAKER or the DEPTH in our SQUAD and that is a big worry, although I am sure that you will have some sort of excuse for that!!


 :nods: :nods:

How do you know they are neutral supporters? You don’t know them personally and they could just say that; as far as we know they could be Chelsea or Ars*nal supporters. I do know that certain people  go on those phone ins and say they are a certain team to annoy certain fans.
As for the game; I saw a lot of positive stuff there (considering we’ve got injuries); and I am not alone in seeing that.

I have said that we need to buy. But we are not as bad as you make out. A full squad – at the moment – and we would have had different results.

Anyway; wait until the end of the season then you can crow as loud as you like and until your heart’s content; that is if we are relegated or are near the bottom of the ladder. I am sure it will be worth it to say that you were right!!!
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 14, 2012, 05:06:13 PM
RSS61,
 At last, someone who takes the time like myself to read posts, and then to make constructive criticism, instead of going on the attack accusing those making the criticisms of supporting other teams in order to to give themselves credence.Thank you I know that we do not necessarily agree on everything but I appreciate your support.

 ;) ;) :nods: :nods:

You mean somebody takes the time to agree with you otherwise they are fools.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 14, 2012, 05:08:08 PM
To be honest, our squad has been awfully thin since January when many players were allowed to go out on loan and at the same time we had many injuries (we always have). It puzzles me how our managements (Redknapp and present management) and board are yet to tackle this issue.

I agree, however, you could look at it another way. Maybe we haven't been buying because we can't get the players we want. Should we be buying for  the sake of it or just to add?
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 14, 2012, 05:11:33 PM
RSS61,
 At last, someone who takes the time like myself to read posts, and then to make constructive criticism, instead of going on the attack accusing those making the criticisms of supporting other teams in order to to give themselves credence.Thank you I know that we do not necessarily agree on everything but I appreciate your support.

 ;) ;) :nods: :nods:

Cheers mate. Like most of us I guess, I'm just trying to be objective about what our problems are, and how best to solve them, rather than simply blaming AVB, who after all is only striving for the same things as us, with lets face it a limited bunch to work with compared to MC MU and Chelsea.

That is the problem; Finch is trying to blame AVB and not being objective. There is nothing wrong with being objective, but there is a problem with those that just want to attack their own team for the sake of it and are heavily influenced by the Chelsea voice.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 15, 2012, 07:37:26 AM
I know they are neutral, because they are friends of mine and I spoke to them face to face, insult was here.




 >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RSS61 on November 15, 2012, 07:58:50 AM
RSS61,
 At last, someone who takes the time like myself to read posts, and then to make constructive criticism, instead of going on the attack accusing those making the criticisms of supporting other teams in order to to give themselves credence.Thank you I know that we do not necessarily agree on everything but I appreciate your support.

 ;) ;) :nods: :nods:

Cheers mate. Like most of us I guess, I'm just trying to be objective about what our problems are, and how best to solve them, rather than simply blaming AVB, who after all is only striving for the same things as us, with lets face it a limited bunch to work with compared to MC MU and Chelsea.

That is the problem; Finch is trying to blame AVB and not being objective. There is nothing wrong with being objective, but there is a problem with those that just want to attack their own team for the sake of it and are heavily influenced by the Chelsea voice.

As Finch said, we dont agree on everything
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Paul Finch on November 15, 2012, 11:55:52 AM
VOICE,
Where in my comments regarding the Man City game have I blamed AVB for the defeat, had you have bothered to read them you would have seen that, but as usual you don't bother to read the posts, just who has written them and then go into your usual diatribe, making your usual excuses, accusations and normal bulls**t comments for the sake of it, and incidentally I do not waste my time or money going on phone-ins, I would suggest you check my location before you make such comments, but of course that would require you to use a modicom of common sense wouldn't it!


 :ohyeah: :ohyeah: :ohyeah:
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 15, 2012, 05:44:14 PM
I know they are neutral, because they are friends of mine and I spoke to them face to face, insult was here.
Friends of yours!? Well that explains it all. Like always goes with like. That is even worse. Can't you think for yourself instead of relying on your friends to think for you?

Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: Glenn R on November 15, 2012, 05:45:45 PM
VOICE,
Where in my comments regarding the Man City game have I blamed AVB for the defeat, had you have bothered to read them you would have seen that, but as usual you don't bother to read the posts, just who has written them and then go into your usual diatribe, making your usual excuses, accusations and normal bulls**t comments for the sake of it, and incidentally I do not waste my time or money going on phone-ins, I would suggest you check my location before you make such comments, but of course that would require you to use a modicom of common sense wouldn't it!


 :ohyeah: :ohyeah: :ohyeah:

I don't have to read one post to know your views on AVB.
Title: Re: Man City v Tottenham
Post by: RiffHard on November 16, 2012, 09:32:48 AM
All right, fellas, keep it clean, please. No need for insulting. This topic is now closed.